I was passed a link with all these charts; here are the interesting ones.
This is a Wikimedia chart drafted by Erik Zachte of page views of the English Wikipedia; it's all broken lines because of the web-crawler traffic which they no longer count. Notice that the solid lines from March (?) of last year are plunging like a flight club Cessna after the gas ran out. Notice also that the mobile site numbers have plateaued with a slight rise around the end of last year. Remember, these are all official numbers.
Active editors, 2003-2015. Notice that most of the editors are very casual, under twenty edits in total, and that group peaked in 2007. I would guess that a lot of these people are now paid editors. The hardest of hard-core editors are a tiny cadre of maybe 1000 people, probably doing most of their edits by 'bots now. This is not a picture of a stable setup; it reminds me of the Ingsoc Party in Nineteen Eighty-Four. The minority of editors are in the Thought Police or the true leadership cadre, the 25+ people are the rest of the Inner Party, and the casuals are the Winston Smiths of the Outer Party.
Of course I could be wrong about the 'bots. Notice how they have been muddling along at 30-25,000 articles and slowly dropping since 2010. I don't know what they count as a "new article" and if the "reg" users are counted as "regs" if they use 'bots. Erik Zachte needs to be talked to, to find out what the hell he meant.
I put the crappy red circle around number two because they were talking about "event logging" at this WMF meeting a few years ago. What that means is they want to track users and kick out IPs of people they don't like. Their only problem is that the Wikipedia Alexa score would drop if they started scanning IPs against a digital shitlist (the site would slow down), so for the Almighty Standings they only go after the editors they don't like and leave the readers alone. That might change if the method of counting views shifts. Which might be never.
***
From Drmies talkpage:
Hi Drmies, is this [6] (off-wiki) harassment? Seems to be pretty recent
(last Dec)? Actually the entire blog seems to be anti. Horseless Headman
(talk) 17:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC).
Yeah, typical. One of
those people with nothing better to do. Unless we figure out who this is
there's little we can do, of course. Zzuuzz, you have a fan out on the
internet. For the record, Zzuuzz is one of those cats who has done more
to keep this website running than a lot of people I know. Thanks, Drmies
(talk) 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks both. My fan
club. I must be improving - I've had entire blogs dedicated to me in the
past. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I
do kind of need to know if the fan club is official or not--I'm trying
to figure out if I can add it to the EL section of your article. Drmies
(talk) 15:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Wow zzuuzz, please keep
up the good work! Even if that means having fans out there :-( Horseless
Headman (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC).
Let me say that is really cute, the line "[u]nless we figure out who this is
there's little we can do....", like they are willing to go on a DDOS crusade to knock this website down, not realizing that the information can be mirrored over and over again. That also shows their true contempt for even the most casual level of journalism; if I really wanted to get Zzuzz I would be using detective techniques and online blackhattery. I will give Drmies this one clue: I was never on Wikipedia, not even as an IP. Go at it Hercule Poirot!
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Guest Post by E.A. Barbour: THERE ARE ONLY THREE KINDS OF WEBSITE, DAMMIT!
This came to me out of nowhere, unbidden. The author knows about the subject deeply, having seen the changes that have barreled through the online world from the 1990s to now.
THERE ARE ONLY THREE KINDS OF WEBSITE, DAMMIT!
by Mr. Barbour
So, as Jimboob would say . . . . . the World Wide Web (which
is a horrible and outdated name for the damn thing) is a vast place, with
billions of sites and hundreds of billions of "invisible" pages. No
one understands it all and no one ever will, it is all the drivel and nonsense
(and some useful information) of humanity distilled into a very large and
smelly bottle of volatile chemicals.
Leave the lid off and it will dissipate rapidly, since the
only real archive (archive.org) is very damn far from being comprehensive. Plus
there are uncounted billions of pages that can't be auto-crawled or indexed.
All quite ephemeral and prone to disappear. Consider what happened to the
millions of personal pages that were hosted on Geocities.com before they were
bought out and everything was shut down. There is a tiny and miserable selection of backed-up pages, so you can get a slight idea of
the width . . . . of the river of utter crap on Geocities. Shreds of it were
useful and most of it wasn't, like the Web in general.
Many academics have tried to study the Web and almost none
of them have distilled any useful facts from their studies. Yet as it has
shaken out since 1991, by becoming a commercial and corporate institution, the
Web has already started to develop "hardened arteries" of its own
unique type. It is now a deeply conservative and rigid structure. Internet
libertarians still think they "control it" and "keep it
free", but they are only kidding themselves. It's actually quite easy to
chop almost the entire Web down into three crude categories, not counting minor
incidentals like government and "overhead". Note that I'm leaving out
smartphone-app-based "communities", because they are specialized;
even so, they are usually profit-related and thus can be categorized as click
magnets.
1. OUTRIGHT CLICKBAIT
Like television in its "Golden Age" of 1947-1970,
the commercial Web has solidified itself around one crude goal: traffic. TV was
all about raw ratings and advertising dollars in its early days, and that is
how the profit-making parts of the Internet are structured. And the primary
model is, of course, BuzzFeed. As time goes on, each and every "news site"
or "outlet" increasingly resembles BuzzFeed, or its even-sleazier
copycats like Upworthy and ViralNova. Calculated to keep morons clicking from
one insipid feel-good or gawking "story" to another, on site as long
as possible and without "offending them" into leaving.
Nearly all major newspaper websites; nearly all major TV
news sites; major newsmagazine sites; Net-only publications like Salon, Slate,
Gawker, TMZ, Digg, etc.; and even retail websites (walmart.com, kmart.com,
amazon.com. etc., etc.) are increasingly BuzzFeed-esque. They grind out the
shallow "You Won't Believe What Happened Next!!" and "Isn't This
Awesome!!!" crap because all that matters are mouse clicks. And most
people are stupid and shallow, and the marketers depend on it. Even if they're
selling hard goods, they also play the clickbait game. The "affiliate
marketing" deals many of these firms make, with sleazy outfits like
Taboola putting boxes full of incredibly-stupid clickbait on "news"
sites, ends up making them look more BuzzFeedy. And above it all sits the
largest search engine, Google. Which also happens to be the world's largest
advertising company. This might as well be the Big Three networks of the 1960s,
grinding out moronic sitcoms ("Mister Ed", anyone?) and variety shows
like toothpaste and filling the gaps with shrieking ads for guess what:
toothpaste, cigarettes, liquor and gas-hog cars. Politics are incidental,
"facts" are incidental. Choose your poison: sappy liberal
clickbaiting (Salon, Mother Jones), sappy conservative clickbaiting (too many
to list here), sappy whatever. They all look the same.
I recently explained to Strelnikov that Newsmax.com, a
so-called "conservative news site", is far more concerned with
turning a profit than with actual conservative political ideals. They grow and
expand and try to compete with Fox News. Yet Newsmax remains a BuzzFeed click
factory at basis. Founder Chris Ruddy sought out funding from right-wing
organizations, and succeeded strongly, because he promised he would make a
profit (unlike most of his pathetic competitors). If there were sufficient
money in running a website full of lesbian furry torture videos, Ruddy would be
doing that instead. For all we know, he IS doing that right now. Thanks to the
Web's libertarian and ephemeral nature, Ruddy would have no difficulty covering
up his association with websites that don't fit well with the Newsmax
"creed". Politics mean nothing, just a click magnet. And nowhere in
any of this is there any talk of "truth" or "accuracy".
And I have to mention the massive irony that Alexa.com, the
major website that rates other websites for traffic, increasingly resembles an
advertising conduit itself. It was bought by Amazon and turned into just
another "business-to-business" money fountain. They even have a
browser toolbar. And their website now hides their most important product, the top-500 website page. We must be in a deep
recession; everyone has their hat out, begging for spare change, maaan.
2. BLOGS
Pure distilled ego in a can. It doesn't matter what a blog
is about, it's always a pissing contest. While large blog platforms like
Blogspot fade out, up pop even crazier versions like Tumblr. I run a Tumblr
blog, and most of Tumblr has revealed itself to be a bizarre little
sub-universe of dull-witted snivelling emo-ridden teenagers trying to
"post something positive". To get attention, not because they have
anything to say. Blogging somewhat overlaps with item 3 below, thanks to
"group blogs" like Boing Boing, which merely have multiple dullards
talking about their insecurities and obsessions and rubber fetishes, rather
than a single dullard. Not to mention "amateur art" sites like
Deviant Art. They end up looking like shitposting blogs anyway -- with bad cartoons.
Plus, Twitter is increasingly starting to resemble a deeply
twisted giant group blog, in which nitwits hurl hashtags at each other. And it
was hard-built into that pinnacle of traffic-chasing and privacy violation,
Facebook. The more a site takes on multiple false fronts and functions, the
more popular it gets. No wonder Facebook is either #1 or #2 in the Alexa
rankings, locked in eternal mortal combat with those little pussies
Larry'n'Sergey.
3. "FREE AND OPEN COMMUNITIES"
There are no such things as "free and open"
communities online, since they almost inevitably end up censored to keep their
neurotic members happy. One should ALWAYS put the word "open" in
quotes when talking about the online world. Example: look at a sports forum
sometime. Yet the libertarian cant about "free and open"-ness that
drives them continues to falsify their actual nature. And keeps people coming
back. The most successful of these take on features of all the above, plus
putting on that essential "uncensored" false front; Facebook, Twitter,
Instagram, Vine, Pinterest, MySpace, Livejournal, Flickr and many competitors
and also-rans. And what would you call the sewer of millions of dull potato
people blathering their usually-half-baked opinions on YouTube and other video
sites? Those, too, are carefully castrated for your protection, while no one is
actually admitting to the censorship. It's all a big game of pretend.
Forums also fit into this definition. Whether general or
specialized, they often start out as "bastions of free speech" and
always end up becoming screwed-down, insecure, and dull places. I've been
bitching for years about Reddit and Metafilter, two of the most famous
versions. People just go right on loving them, despite their massive flaws and
lack of transparency. Go to reddit.com/r/redditcritiques if you want to see
summaries of Reddit's dirty dealings over the years. (You won't find it
anywhere else on Reddit.)
Open-source software sites? If they have forums or comment
areas, they turn into "open communities", meaning not actually open.
Meaning paranoid shriek-fests. Have you seen SourceForge's front page lately? The resemblance to a profit-making, click-sucking
corporate site is amazing. Because guess what, bunky, it now belongs to a profit-making corporation.
The same outfit owns that "magical place of freedom" called Slashdot.
Github looks much the same. I fully except to see more of
this in open-source land in the future. "Free" software isn't truly
"free" because most open-source programmers work on their projects on
their employer's paid time, especially programmers in Europe; the vast majority
of Linux projects are developed like that. Buying for-profit software has the
costs of some open-source software built into the price. Everything has hidden
costs, whether people in IT admit it or not.
And then we have that ultimate libertarian-lie freakshow
called Wikipedia. The weirdest outlier of all -- full of random lunatics
"pretend-writing an encyclopedia", and sometimes actually writing
something. While other lunatics use it as a giant and deeply-ADHD Facebook
clone in the background. Read the AN/I noticeboard or Jimbotalk and tell me
that isn't a Facebook, I dare you. Because it's "free and open" (read
"badly designed and chaotic"), anyone wanting to edit for pay, that
terrible wiki-crime, can usually get away with it easily. And if you want to
use it to step on people, just suck up to the insiders for a couple of years
and they'll hand you the keys. Sick fun for the whole family. Well, the young
male asshole members thereof, mostly.
Or better yet, go and look at Wikipedia IRC channels. They make
ideal examples of the sickness of IRC communitarianism. Even though it's as
"obsolete" as all hell and not part of the Web, IRC continues to be
popular with Web and IT professionals and hackers. Who are often one and the
same. Important subjects are quite predictable: video gaming, porn,
"warez", fucking one's enemies over, whining about politics, and so
forth. Few popular channels could conceivably be called "free
speech", as in: you say anything on a channel that a few moderators don't
like, and you're gone in an instant. That's censorship. And it's easy. So, IRC
continues to operate.
GO AHEAD
Please, prove me wrong. Find a popular website that doesn't
fit into at least one of the above categories, if not all three, apart from
minor info/propaganda outlets like government sites. Yahoo is admittedly a
giant mess and not easily pigeonholed. Yet it is trying to become another
Facebook, mostly because it's declining. There are some various obscurities
that don't fit, but they are almost never "popular" in any wild
stretch of the term. (Encyclopedia Dramatica is just another "fake free
community". And has been down for a week now anyway. Oops.) [Dramatica came back to life less than a day after this piece was sent - Strelnikov.]
Whereas weirdness and chaos made up most of the Web's
structure in 1996, twenty years later the vast bulk of the traffic is
money-making, ego, and/or "phony free speech" oriented. I've been
predicting since 1996 that the Web would end up being heavily taxed, regulated
and censored, and it happened. But the government didn't do it. The users did
it to themselves. Huzzah.
Response by Strelnikov.
To me, the early Internet looked like it did because it came out of academia and the think-tank culture, which was using it for communication, weapon simulations, other hard-science stuff with military applications and then the network was opened to Joe Public, and a lot of those guys came from the BBS (bulletin-board system) culture of the 1980s; many of them were amateur radio ("ham") operators and ex-CBers and they brought those mentalities to computers. The other sort of notable "content providers" were 'zine publishers taking their publications and converting them into html. That model of running a website is still around in the more basement-y parts on the Internet; James Moseley of Saucer Smear (formerly Saucer News and Saucer Glues) used to have a man retype his typed, photocopied newsletter into html format, until Moseley died in 2012 and the entire online archives (1994-2012) were snapped up by a junk UFO publisher and sold on CD. All of his pre-Internet stuff from the 1950s to the 1980s is in the hads of collectors. So the first five or six years of the Internet were like living in a giant dorm (because all the servers were university owned) that also housed techies, old people, the religiously-insane, Klansmen (the extreme Right got online early, believe it or not), etc. I miss those years because the thing wasn't as formulaic; we no longer have sites like "Grandpa's House of Pee", "Hell.com","Fat Chicks in Party Hats".....the last of that sort of website had to be Gene Ray's "Time Cube" and now that's defunct.
As for the rest of Mr. Barbour's argument I agree with it only with the addition that the Internet has been a mirror of the globalized Neo-Liberal economic model, and that way of doing business is not very healthy right now. I get the feeling that we are on an edge of an implosion online because the business model is built around adverting, and if that goes away, this little "Web 2.0" world we live in will disappear like GeoCities and Pets.com.
Response by Strelnikov.
To me, the early Internet looked like it did because it came out of academia and the think-tank culture, which was using it for communication, weapon simulations, other hard-science stuff with military applications and then the network was opened to Joe Public, and a lot of those guys came from the BBS (bulletin-board system) culture of the 1980s; many of them were amateur radio ("ham") operators and ex-CBers and they brought those mentalities to computers. The other sort of notable "content providers" were 'zine publishers taking their publications and converting them into html. That model of running a website is still around in the more basement-y parts on the Internet; James Moseley of Saucer Smear (formerly Saucer News and Saucer Glues) used to have a man retype his typed, photocopied newsletter into html format, until Moseley died in 2012 and the entire online archives (1994-2012) were snapped up by a junk UFO publisher and sold on CD. All of his pre-Internet stuff from the 1950s to the 1980s is in the hads of collectors. So the first five or six years of the Internet were like living in a giant dorm (because all the servers were university owned) that also housed techies, old people, the religiously-insane, Klansmen (the extreme Right got online early, believe it or not), etc. I miss those years because the thing wasn't as formulaic; we no longer have sites like "Grandpa's House of Pee", "Hell.com","Fat Chicks in Party Hats".....the last of that sort of website had to be Gene Ray's "Time Cube" and now that's defunct.
As for the rest of Mr. Barbour's argument I agree with it only with the addition that the Internet has been a mirror of the globalized Neo-Liberal economic model, and that way of doing business is not very healthy right now. I get the feeling that we are on an edge of an implosion online because the business model is built around adverting, and if that goes away, this little "Web 2.0" world we live in will disappear like GeoCities and Pets.com.
Sunday, January 10, 2016
The 2011 Wikimedia Foundation Secret Donor List
We have Greg Kohs to thank for this one, indirectly; this is the list of donors that Wikimedia Foundation software developer Ryan Faulkner (rfaulk) accidentally published to mediawiki.org on March 10th of that year. He tried to clean up his mess, somebody noticed before he did, and the 7 and 1/2 page list was Google-cached. Kohs noticed the list on Google, put it on his MyWikiBiz website, then made a news story out of it. Big names are on this list: ex-president Jimmy Carter, Jeff Bezos (Amazon.com founder), Warren Buffet, David Filo and Jerry Yang (co-founders of Yahoo.com) plus Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, Steve "the Woz" Wozniak (co-founder of Apple Computer), Michael Dell (Dell Computer), Caterina Fake (co-founder of Flickr), George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg and Sean Parker of Facebook, Vinod Khosla the venture capitalist and his wife, Gil Penchina (former Wikia CEO), even Bono under his true name (Paul Hewson.) Beyond those, there are also names from the founders of Sun Microsystems, the Google principals and people from their Tides Foundation, Gabe Newell the gamer hero/walking meme, and Jimbo Wales future wife Kate Garvey. There are also a number of other big players from Silly Valley on the list; this collection of names is why Wales and his gang feel invulnerable. Notable or bizarre (as in "why are they there?") names have been bolded.
Revision: 83679 Author: rfaulk Date: 2011-03-10 23:43:49 +0000 (Thu, 10 Mar 2011) Log Message: ----------- Removing major donor names from the repository in compliance with the provacy policy. Removed Paths: -------------
MediaWiki-CVS mailing list MediaWiki-CVS@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-cvs[1]
The secret donor list
[MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [83679]
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv
rfaulk
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:44:01 -0800
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/83679Revision: 83679 Author: rfaulk Date: 2011-03-10 23:43:49 +0000 (Thu, 10 Mar 2011) Log Message: ----------- Removing major donor names from the repository in compliance with the provacy policy. Removed Paths: -------------
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv/Rebeccas_Contacts_Donation_Alerts.csv
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv/Rebeccas_Contacts_Donation_Alerts_mod.csv
Deleted:
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv/Rebeccas_Contacts_Donation_Alerts.csv
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv/Rebeccas_Contacts_Donation_Alerts.csv
2011-03-10 23:31:20 UTC (rev 83678) +++
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv/Rebeccas_Contacts_Donation_Alerts.csv
2011-03-10 23:43:49 UTC (rev 83679) @@
-1,258 +0,0 @@
-Internal Contact ID, Sort
Name,First Name,Last Name,Contact Type
-120842 ,Abramowicz,
David,David,Abramowicz,Individual
-507392, Abu Sulayman, Muna,Muna,Abu
Sulayman,Individual
-512403, Altarescu,
Howard,Howard,Altarescu,Individual
-512415, Anderson,
Chris,Chris,Anderson,Individual
-507470, Andreessen,
Marc,Marc,Andreessen,Individual
-507462, Arlene and Arnold
Goldstein Family Foundation,,,Organization
-507393, Arnott,
Robert,Robert,Arnott,Individual
-512407, Avanessians,
Armen,Armen,Avanessians,Individual
-507394, Babcock,
John,John,Babcock,Individual
-507395, Bader,
Lars,Lars,Bader,Individual
-507396, Bahles,
Shanda,Shanda,Bahles,Individual
-507397, Banister,
Scott,Scott,Banister,Individual
-507471, Battelle,
John,John,Battelle,Individual
-507398, Bauer,
Alan,Alan,Bauer,Individual
-507399, Bechtolsheim,
Andreas,Andreas,Bechtolsheim,Individual
-507400, Benenson,
Bruce,Bruce,Benenson,Individual
-507401, Benenson,
Frederick,Frederick,Benenson,Individual
-507402, Benenson,
Lawrence,Lawrence,Benenson,Individual
-507403, Benhamou,
Eric,Eric,Benhamou,Individual
-507405, Bezos,
Jeff,Jeff,Bezos,Individual
-301203, Bharatwaj, Sandeep,Sandeep,Bharatwaj,Individual
-507472, Birch,
Michael,Michael,Birch,Individual
-507406, Birch,
Xochi,Xochi,Birch,Individual
-196176, Bistransin,
Cat,Cat,Bistransin,Individual
-507407, Bjelic,
Milonja,Milonja,Bjelic,Individual
-512393, Blouin, Louise,Louise,Blouin,Individual
-507409, Blumenthal,
Betsy,Betsy,Blumenthal,Individual
-507410, Bowes,
William,William,Bowes,Individual
-507412, Branson,
Richard,Richard,Branson,Individual
-507413, Brin,
Sergey,Sergey,Brin,Individual
-509395, Bronfman, Edgar,Edgar,Bronfman,Individual
-507416, Bronfman,
Sara,Sara,Bronfman,Individual
-505536, Buer,
Eric,Eric,Buer,Individual
-96072, Buffett,
Warren,Warren,Buffett,Individual
-220954, Burdick,
Edward,Edward,Burdick,Individual
-248668, Burdisso,
Riccardo,Riccardo,Burdisso,Individual
-13198, Burt and Diana Cutler
Family Foundation,,,Organization
-78643, Cabot,
Blake,Blake,Cabot,Individual
-146945, Cakanj,
Andor,Andor,Cakanj,Individual
-467956, Campbell-White,
Annette,Annette,Campbell-White,Individual
-96074, Carter,
Jimmy,Jimmy,Carter,Individual
-246810, Casey,
Charlie,Charlie,Casey,Individual
-346257, Cenedella,
Marc,Marc,Cenedella,Individual
-262880, Chopra,
Parveen,Parveen,Chopra,Individual
-97235, Christopher
Ruddy,,,Household
-96340, Coleman, Bill,Bill,Coleman,Individual
-94, Community Foundation Silicon
Valley,,,Organization
-96039, Conrad,
Tom,Tom,Conrad,Individual
-244618, Conway,
Ron,Ron,Conway,Individual
-133365, Cook,
Courtney,Courtney,Cook,Individual
-96040, Cook,
Scott,Scott,Cook,Individual
-245034, Craigslist Charitable
Fund,,,Organization
-40092, Crnkovic,
Cedomir,Cedomir,Crnkovic,Individual
-492085, Cummings,
David,David,Cummings,Individual
-478475, Cunniff,
Richard,Richard,Cunniff,Individual
-246939, Davidson,
Jim,Jim,Davidson,Individual
-319720, Day,
Adrian,Adrian,Day,Individual
-249250, De Felici, Lucio,Lucio,De
Felici,Individual
-96042, Dell,
Michael,Michael,Dell,Individual
-505437, Deutsch,
Donny,Donny,Deutsch,Individual
-167158, Devi,
Gayatri,Gayatri,Devi,Individual
-14253,Diamant, Michael,Michael,Diamant,Individual
-96273, Dikshit,
Anurag,Anurag,Dikshit,Individual
-505438, Dobron,
Albert,Albert,Dobron,Individual
-800180, Doctorow,
Cory,Cory,Doctorow,Individual
-96078,Doerr,
John,John,Doerr,Individual
-784599, Domino,
Mark,Mark,Domino,Individual
-475963, Donovan, Mary Ellen,Mary
Ellen,Donovan,Individual
-518254, Durst,
Douglas,Douglas,Durst,Individual
-245257, Dyson,
Esther,Esther,Dyson,Individual
-512446, Eckstein,
John,John,Eckstein,Individual
-96139, Fake,
Caterina,Caterina,Fake,Individual
-248667, Ferrero,
Michele,Michele,Ferrero,Individual
-248669, Ferrero,
Pietro,Pietro,Ferrero,Individual
-248666, Fieber,
Jon,Jon,Fieber,Individual
-96080, Filo,
David,David,Filo,Individual
-493055, Fink,
Max,Max,Fink,Individual
-455457, Fox, Saul,Saul,Fox,Individual
-240341, Frank and Denise Quattrone
Foundation,,,Organization
-244619, Gallanter,
Sandy,Sandy,Gallanter,Individual
-166387, Gardner,
Loraine,Loraine,Gardner,Individual
-491866, Garland
Foundation,,,Organization
-97484, Garnett, Katrina,Katrina,Garnett,Individual
-505440, Garvey,
Kate,Kate,Garvey,Individual
-505535, Geisert,
Chris,Chris,Geisert,Individual
-96082, Gilmore,
Jon,Jon,Gilmore,Individual
-505442, Glocer,
Thomas,Thomas,Glocer,Individual
-248678, Godhwani, Anil,Anil,Godhwani,Individual
-244455, Goldhaber,
Nat,Nat,Goldhaber,Individual
-240356, Goldstein,
Arnold,Arnold,Goldstein,Individual
-498677, Google Inc. Charitable
Giving Fund of Tides Foundation,,,Organization
-13021, Graphics Press,
LLC,,,Organization
-100310, Greenspun,
Daniel,Daniel,Greenspun,Individual
-97487, Grimes,
Michael,Michael,Grimes,Individual
-248682, Gurley,
Bill,Bill,Gurley,Individual
-500357, Hammerschlag,
Cheryl,Cheryl,Hammerschlag,Individual
-491733, Harnisch
Foundation,,,Organization
-512462, Harnisch, Ruth Ann,Ruth
Ann,Harnisch,Individual
-493628, Hatch,
Jonathan,Jonathan,Hatch,Individual
-512401, Hatkoff,
Craig,Craig,Hatkoff,Individual
-96087, Hearst,
William,William,Hearst,Individual
-252707, Heiferman,
Scott,Scott,Heiferman,Individual
-499654 ,Heising Simons
Fund,,,Organization
-506388, Heising,
Mark,Mark,Heising,Individual
-173620, Heldring,
Gretchen,Gretchen,Heldring,Individual
-245238, Hellman Family
Foundation,,,Organization
-96346, Hellman,
Warren,Warren,Hellman,Individual
-246809, Hewson, Paul,Paul,Hewson,Individual
-512457, Hidary,
Murray,Murray,Hidary,Individual
-116729, Hirsch,
David,David,Hirsch,Individual
-244614 ,Hirsch,
Ken,Ken,Hirsch,Individual
-96044, Hoffman,
Reid,Reid,Hoffman,Individual
-15829, Holbrook, Adam,Adam,Holbrook,Individual
-505443,Holz,
Claudia,Claudia,Holz,Individual
-248701, Hornthal,
Jim,Jim,Hornthal,Individual
-260654, Howard,
Cheryl,Cheryl,Howard,Individual
-512405, Hsu,
Fred,Fred,Hsu,Individual
-248705, Huffington,
Arianna,Arianna,Huffington,Individual
-506675, Hunt,
Jolie,Jolie,Hunt,Individual
-481190, Isaac,
Paul,Paul,Isaac,Individual
-110868 ,Ito,
Joichi,Joichi,Ito,Individual
-47227, Jaeckel,
Howard,Howard,Jaeckel,Individual
-100414, Jarvis,
Jonathan,Jonathan,Jarvis,Individual
-96136, John and Frances Beck
Foundation,,,Organization
-421728, Joo,
Eungie,Eungie,Joo,Individual
-96045, Joy,
Bill,Bill,Joy,Individual
-50917, Kahle,
Brewster,Brewster,Kahle,Individual
-466004, Kaphan
Foundation,,,Organization
-96047, Kapor, Mitch,Mitch,Kapor,Individual
-244427, Karlin,
Alison,Alison,Karlin,Individual
-96048, Khosla,
Neeru,Neeru,Khosla,Individual
-96141, Khosla,
Vinod,Vinod,Khosla,Individual
-501528, Knuth,
Jill,Jill,Knuth,Individual
-245480, Koch,
David,David,Koch,Individual
-239206, Konya,
Andras,Andras,Konya,Individual
-238991, Lamb,
William,William,Lamb,Individual
-408923, Landau,
David,David,Landau,Individual
-487974, Lars Bader Charitable
Trust,,,Organization
-413214, Lee,
Jenny,Jenny,Lee,Individual
-71222, Levchin, Max,Max,Levchin,Individual
-136310,Levy-Hinte,
Jeffrey,Jeffrey,Levy-Hinte,Individual
-96093,Lilly,
John,John,Lilly,Individual
-862070, Little,
John,John,Little,Individual
-96096, Luczo,
Stephen,Stephen,Luczo,Individual
-483033, Macomb, Edward,Edward,Macomb,Individual
-168381, Marian L. Freeman
Foundation,,,Organization
-241658, Mark Heising and Elizabeth
Simons,,,Household
-499284, Maurice
LaCroix,,,Organization
-512320, Mayer,
Marissa,Marissa,Mayer,Individual
-96050, Mayfield,
Ross,Ross,Mayfield,Individual
-509264, McCorvie,
Lisa,Lisa,McCorvie,Individual
-512468, McCorvie,
Ryan,Ryan,McCorvie,Individual
-494621, McFadden,
Carol,Carol,McFadden,Individual
-283995, McGrath,
Faye,Faye,McGrath,Individual
-512455, McGreevy,
Maura,Maura,McGreevy,Individual
-96051, McNamee,
Roger,Roger,McNamee,Individual
-96099, McNealy,
Scott,Scott,McNealy,Individual
-120086, Meeker,
Mary,Mary,Meeker,Individual
-96135, Merit,
Richard,Richard,Merit,Individual
-247787, Microsoft Corporation -
Bing,,,Organization
-60232, Minor, Michael,Michael,Minor,Individual
-100052, Mitchell Kapor
Foundation,,,Organization
-326216, Moorhead Family
Fund,,,Organization
-233179, Moorhead,
Rodman,Rodman,Moorhead,Individual
-491550, Mordechai,
Sony,Sony,Mordechai,Individual
-237264, Moynihan, Jon,Jon,Moynihan,Individual
-303813, Narins,
Joshua,Joshua,Narins,Individual
-96102, Negroponte,
Nick,Nick,Negroponte,Individual
-506389, Neilson,
Trevor,Trevor,Neilson,Individual
-505450, Neville-Manning,
Craig,Craig,Neville-Manning,Individual
-517770, Newell, Gabe,Gabe,Newell,Individual
-96103, Newmark,
Craig,Craig,Newmark,Individual
-129683, Newsmax Media
Inc.,,,Organization
-96052, Nilekani,
Nandan,Nandan,Nilekani,Individual
-512419, Novogratz,
Jacqueline,Jacqueline,Novogratz,Individual
-512270, Ojha, Purnendu,Purnendu,Ojha,Individual
-505419, O'Kelley,
Brian,Brian,O'Kelley,Individual
-203210, Okrent,
Daniel,Daniel,Okrent,Individual
-96104, Omidyar,
Pierre,Pierre,Omidyar,Individual
-240385, One Nation/One
California,,,Organization
-512436, Orbison, Barbara,Barbara,Orbison,Individual
-163878, Osher,
Bernard,Bernard,Osher,Individual
-96105, Overdeck,
John,John,Overdeck,Individual
-96054, Page,
Larry,Larry,Page,Individual
-96055, Papadopoulos,
Greg,Greg,Papadopoulos,Individual
-509394, Parker,
Sean,Sean,Parker,Individual
-505453, Parvaneh,
Amy,Amy,Parvaneh,Individual
-96106, Patrick,
John,John,Patrick,Individual
-96270, Penchina,
Gil,Gil,Penchina,Individual
-509776, Pomirska,
Julia,Julia,Pomirska,Individual
-327117, poulter,
Martin,Martin,poulter,Individual
-146485, Prabhala,
Achal,Achal,Prabhala,Individual
-60473, Pritzker,
Joseph,Joseph,Pritzker,Individual
-481982, Pritzker,
Rosemary,Rosemary,Pritzker,Individual
-505459, Pritzker, Tal Hava,Tal
Hava,Pritzker,Individual
-506390, Riccitiello,
John,John,Riccitiello,Individual
-512453, Rijhsinghani,
Kiran,Kiran,Rijhsinghani,Individual
-320044, Riordan,
Neil,Neil,Riordan,Individual
-97489, Rosensweig,
Dan,Dan,Rosensweig,Individual
-506391, Ruddy,
Chris,Chris,Ruddy,Individual
-96056, Saal,
Harry,Harry,Saal,Individual
-512452, Sacks,
Oliver,Oliver,Sacks,Individual
-436996, Sagalovskaya,
Anna,Anna,Sagalovskaya,Individual
-96057, Sandberg,
Sheryl,Sheryl,Sandberg,Individual
-266383, Sandis,
Eva,Eva,Sandis,Individual
-96142, Sandler, Herb Marion,Herb
Marion,Sandler,Individual
-96058, Sandler,
Marion,Marion,Sandler,Individual
-512460, Schonfeld,
Reese,Reese,Schonfeld,Individual
-172452, Schrader,
Jacob,Jacob,Schrader,Individual
-209350, Shah,
Devesh,Devesh,Shah,Individual
-422451, Shemel,
Mark,Mark,Shemel,Individual
-96109, Shriram,
Ram,Ram,Shriram,Individual
-96061, Sifry,
Dave,Dave,Sifry,Individual
-245525, Sillerman,
Laura,Laura,Sillerman,Individual
-108520, Silverman,
Marc,Marc,Silverman,Individual
-14825, Simons
Foundation,,,Organization
-506387, Simons, Elizabeth,Elizabeth,Simons,Individual
-96275, Simonyi,
Charles,Charles,Simonyi,Individual
-294082, Smeal,
Benjamin,Benjamin,Smeal,Individual
-307408, Smollett,
Sara,Sara,Smollett,Individual
-250098, Sobieski,
Ian,Ian,Sobieski,Individual
-238885, Social Relations of Knowledge
Institute,,,Organization
-205299, Sokoloff,
Audrey,Audrey,Sokoloff,Individual
-44, Sorensen,
Jeffrey,Jeffrey,Sorensen,Individual
-96062, Soros,
George,George,Soros,Individual
-239655, Souza,
Shelley,Shelley,Souza,Individual
-248467, Spencer, Bill,Bill,Spencer,Individual
-96347, Steyer,
Thomas,Thomas,Steyer,Individual
-505605, Strassen,
Tyko,Tyko,Strassen,Individual
-153701, Stresemann,
Andreas,Andreas,Stresemann,Individual
-492863, Tanimoto,
Yoh,Yoh,Tanimoto,Individual
-613570, The Gasper Mary Takach
Charitable Trust,,,Organization
-506392, Tidwell,
Brandon,Brandon,Tidwell,Individual
-289522, Totty,
Brian,Brian,Totty,Individual
-327173, turner,
jedediah,jedediah,turner,Individual
-13016, Two Sigma Investments
LLC,,,Organization
-243589, Universal City Studios,
LLP,,,Organization
-240342, Unz
Foundation,,,Organization
-96063, Unz, Ron,Ron,Unz,Individual
-115843, Valenstein,
Adam,Adam,Valenstein,Individual
-246615, Violet Mauray Charitable
Trust,,,Organization
-443668, Vogelmann,
Melody,Melody,Vogelmann,Individual
-505460, Vogelstein,
Barbara,Barbara,Vogelstein,Individual
-96118, Waters,
Alice,Alice,Waters,Individual
-248680, Weekes,
Gage,Gage,Weekes,Individual
-505454, Wenig,
Devin,Devin,Wenig,Individual
-188854, Whelan,
Anne,Anne,Whelan,Individual
-173873, Williams,
Barrett,Barrett,Williams,Individual
-241849, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich
and Rosati Foundation,,,Organization
-213255, Wolf,
Jerry,Jerry,Wolf,Individual
-4368, Wozniak,
Steve,Steve,Wozniak,Individual
-96124, Yang,
Jerry,Jerry,Yang,Individual
-490031, Yardi Systems,
Inc.,,,Organization
-248911, Zack,
Howard,Howard,Zack,Individual
-505461, Zinterhofer,
Eric,Eric,Zinterhofer,Individual
-163900, Zuckerberg,
Mark,Mark,Zuckerberg,Individual
-509396, Zuckerman,
Mort,Mort,Zuckerman,Individual
MediaWiki-CVS mailing list MediaWiki-CVS@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-cvs[1]
[MediaWiki-CVS]
SVN: [83679]
trunk/fundraiser-statistics/fundraiser-scripts/csv rfaulk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)