tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post7672054194916571800..comments2024-02-09T18:00:54.419-08:00Comments on Wikipedia Sucks! (And So Do Its Critics.): "Operation Swill" and TGI Friday's - or: Don't Go To New Jersey, And Don't Look It Up On WikipediaStrelnikovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12660962615198939441noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-21207878888326183212015-12-16T15:49:14.087-08:002015-12-16T15:49:14.087-08:00Also:
I was just saying he libeled me, I made no t...Also:<br />I was just saying he libeled me, I made no threats to sue. He said something that was untrue about me in a manner insinuating it was true, e.g. libel.<br /><br />Also- This isn't WP, so that whole "no legal threats" wouldn't be pertinent anyways. You can't be a hypocrite if you haven't said one thing and done another. <br /><br />I'm not going to sue him, he has the right to say what he wants - he just needs to verify the facts before saying it.<br /><br />Jerem43Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-47031863206694936942015-12-16T15:15:02.353-08:002015-12-16T15:15:02.353-08:00I have no idea who that is since I have never used...I have no idea who that is since I have never used Google+Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-90023216189993754162015-08-30T12:43:07.553-07:002015-08-30T12:43:07.553-07:00So your real name must be Jeremy Brown.
https://p...So your real name must be Jeremy Brown.<br /><br />https://plus.google.com/117450994615596978385/posts<br /><br />PS: "What you have done here, for those who are more litigous than I, is known as libel."....what happened to "No Legal Threats"? Hypocrite.metasonixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13224183744460116842noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-56865000202087202014-11-18T13:18:09.564-08:002014-11-18T13:18:09.564-08:00For some reason this logged me into through my fri...For some reason this logged me into through my friends account.<br /><br />Jerem43Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15854933823795653234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-50899824695098131952014-11-18T13:17:01.498-08:002014-11-18T13:17:01.498-08:00You're missing the point:
You view Wikipedia ...You're missing the point:<br /><br />You view Wikipedia through a lens of hate. As such you see everything done on that website as questionable or suspect. As such, and since you do not know who I am, what I like, or why I edit Wikipedia, you view me through the same lens.<br /><br />You assume that since I made an edit that you disagree with, I therefore must have an agenda or other such thing. You assume I must be doing the edits because someone is paying me to do so, not because I disagreed with them. You forget that assumption is the mother of all screw ups.<br /><br />What you have done here, for those who are more litigous than I, is known as libel.<br /><br />What I am is a person who has worked in restaurants for more than 30 years, what I am doing is applying that knowledge to developing articles on the industry, and nothing else. I have no agenda, I am not pro-anything or anti-anything, and I am not nor have I ever been paid shill for anyone. The edit I made to that article was not to defend anyone or anything. I simply did not agree with it, it allegations, and the reasoning behind it.<br /><br />Your rant is off-center and incorrect. Like I said before your lens of hate skewers your view of the website. That same lens of hate is coloring your view of other people, their intentions, and their actions, and as such is wrong.<br /><br />I am not seeing just through the context of an edit war, it is neither black nor white nor paranoid. You are the one who cannot understand that.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15854933823795653234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-19616763078497904272014-11-18T07:46:11.661-08:002014-11-18T07:46:11.661-08:00The author wrote me this in response:
"That&...The author wrote me this in response:<br /><br />"That's dead typical. They simply cannot figure out why someone would hate them, other than in the context of an editwar. They think in pure black-and-white paranoid terms. The idea that someone who wasn't fighting over Scientology, or politics, or pseudoscience, or whatever articles would hate them simply for being corrupt little assholes -- they just can't understand that."Strelnikovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12660962615198939441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-49801018346995681632014-11-16T23:08:53.616-08:002014-11-16T23:08:53.616-08:00You know, I was going to post a profanity-laden sc...You know, I was going to post a profanity-laden scribe about you, your parentage and your general person. Then I realized that you're not worth the four letter words.<br /><br />I will say this: who on Wikipedia butt hurt you so much that you have to setup such a trivial little blog about the site and its editors? Did you not get your way in an article? Did you get banned for stupid things such as this? <br /><br />So someone edited an article, an edit you did liked, and the edit was removed because it wasn't factual. (read the sources, Fridays did not have anything to do with the fraud, its franchisee did. There is a distinction between the two, despite what you promote) So since this little piece of falsehood wasn't allowed to stand, you decide to shoot/discredit/make shit stuff up about the messenger. You have decided to use the classic distraction tactic of those who don't what to hear the truth, or simply cannot accept the truth, instead of accepting crazy things such as facts.<br /><br />May I suggest http://www.conservapedia.com/, a site for those who decide to live in their own personal reality where things such as truth or facts don't get in the way.<br /><br />Jerem43Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com