tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post4055658873859485048..comments2024-02-09T18:00:54.419-08:00Comments on Wikipedia Sucks! (And So Do Its Critics.): Why Stierlitz was Thrown off Wikipediocracy's Message BoardStrelnikovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12660962615198939441noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-71432970106079540932015-10-28T18:53:30.597-07:002015-10-28T18:53:30.597-07:00It appears to have been disconfirmed a week ago.It appears to have been disconfirmed a week ago.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-55323232492186556162015-10-19T17:13:53.915-07:002015-10-19T17:13:53.915-07:00No, the person was there a day ago commenting.No, the person was there a day ago commenting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-78744668323730482112015-10-18T20:15:45.952-07:002015-10-18T20:15:45.952-07:00Well, he abandoned reddit just as "Logic'...Well, he abandoned reddit just as "Logic'd" abandoned Tumblr. "Communism Kills!" is still up, unfortunately, so we can't make it 3 for 3.Strelnikovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12660962615198939441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-6489065006200391352015-10-15T22:11:47.951-07:002015-10-15T22:11:47.951-07:00compare-
https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/com...compare-<br />https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3awmjf/interesting_vandalism_bizarre_instant_messenger/<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASea_lion&type=revision&diff=668295304&oldid=601093714Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-74314178785636692012015-10-15T22:05:30.435-07:002015-10-15T22:05:30.435-07:00StukaLied is Starke Hathaway. It's not that ha...StukaLied is Starke Hathaway. It's not that hard to figure out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-43440035026931257992015-10-12T08:24:41.697-07:002015-10-12T08:24:41.697-07:00I know who StukaLied is. He's a great Apache-k...I know who StukaLied is. He's a great Apache-kin sent to right Wiki wrongs with a style and verve that Wikipiedocracy only wishes they had. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-45865219817124181672015-10-11T23:00:20.564-07:002015-10-11T23:00:20.564-07:00"Monty" Burns has to have a list on his ..."Monty" Burns has to have a list on his hard drive at home, it would be too annoying to keep all those names in his head.<br /><br />"A blog [post] about 'how Jimbo is walking away from Wikipedia' would be welcome." It will come.....that watch ad Jimbo did in 2012 was a sign that his game from now on will be to use Wikipedia's name for gain, and he has gone down that path from that point onward.Strelnikovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12660962615198939441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9056329851028618436.post-81486875163042722532015-10-11T21:54:58.551-07:002015-10-11T21:54:58.551-07:00Too often the behavior of some WO leaders breeds c...Too often the behavior of some WO leaders breeds cynicism rather than reform. As you pointed out many WO members are less concerned with reforming Wikipedia than being accepted by Wikipedians. WO's mission: "to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of..." is ironic given their allergies to scrutiny and light. "When you have Greg Kohs (thekohser) threatening to DMCA the last post because it quotes WO-MB members, your forum and blog has become kind of a cult to the Wikipedia mode of 'shit-talk, then bury it.'" The hypocrisy of some WO-MB leaders will defeat their mission despite protestations to the contrary. When a critical source is irreparably tainted, the media, the public, and governing officials may reject the criticism as well as the source. There is no David and Goliath story when David is as bad as Goliath. <br /><br />"He became the uncrowned king of Off Topics, which seems to have quietly infuriated some of the senior members (though he got no hint of that.)" Yes, you deciphered the invisible ink on the WO-MB wall.<br /><br />MMAR was not of the WO-MB body. Accordingly, he was publicly banned for unspecified reasons. I suspect there isn't a complete list of invisibly banned WO-MB members, and the WO admins and trustees may not recall them all. Some trustees and former trustees may not know what was done ostensibly at their behest, though I don't know why.<br /><br />A blog about "how Jimbo is walking away from Wikipedia" would be welcome. Clearly laying out Jimbo's present and potential future endeavors would be edifying and socially responsible journalistic blogging.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com